Decompositions: Accounting for Discrimination

Gurleen Popli

No 2022009, Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics

Abstract: This chapter summarises the different regression based decomposition methods used in the empirical literature to evaluate discrimination. Starting with the decomposition at the mean using the methods made popular in the 1970s by Oaxaca and Blinder, we discuss how the method has evolved over time to look beyond the means, taking into account the entire distribution of the outcomes of interest. We present the formal identification assumptions underlying the decomposition method and discuss cautions that should be exercised in interpreting them and their limitations. We also explain how the ‘unexplained gap’ in the decomposition, often used as a measure of discrimination, relates to the treatment effect literature.

Keywords: Decomposition; Counterfactual regressions; Distributions; Discrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 J31 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18 pages
Date: 2022-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-net, nep-reg and nep-tre
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps First version, June 2022 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:shf:wpaper:2022009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mike Crabtree ().