Deprivation of Liberty - Medical Punishment during the State of Emergency in Romania

Marius-Adrian Arva ()
Additional contact information
Marius-Adrian Arva: Alexandru Ioan Cuza of Bucharest, Romania

ConScienS Conference Proceedings from Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies

Abstract: The state of emergency established in Romania as a result of the epidemiological evolution determined the authorities to take extraordinary measures to limit the pandemic's negative effects, being adopted rules stating that individuals for which self-isolation or quarantine was established who do not comply with these measures will be forcibly placed into quarantine, under guard, being held for criminal liability, and also put to pay the expenses incurred. To these considerations, the present study proposes the thesis that the forced quarantine must be assimilated to placing the person in detention, within the meaning of the criminal law for this, contemplating that the state has violated procedural rights of individuals, as well as the right to free access to justice, the measures imposed by the analyzed rules aiming in fact at the most drastic resort possible, without giving the possibility to establish proportionate measures. The study also shows that the rules exceed the framework of the tactical police measure of leading persons to the headquarters of a judiciary organization, as well as that the misdemeanor or criminal punishment of persons who do not comply with the measure of self-isolation or quarantine, complementary to the measure of forced quarantine and the imputation of the expenses occasioned by this measure, violates the criminal procedural principle ne bis in idem, given that the authorities have in fact sought to double sanction individuals targeted by these measures. In order to demonstrate the submitted theses, a qualitative analysis will be made of the concepts captured in the jurisprudence of the constitutional and the supreme courts of Romania, as well as in the cases of interest with which the European Court of Human Rights was invested, not least, pointing the discoveries reported in the criminal doctrine on the elements introduced in this paper.

Keywords: emergency state; institutionalized quarantine; deprivation of liberty; ne bis in idem; policing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 6 pages
Date: 2020-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in the ConScienS Conference Proceedings, September 28-29, 2020, pages 145-151

Downloads: (external link)
http://society.education/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/024AV.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:smo:conswp:024av

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ConScienS Conference Proceedings from Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Eduard David ().