EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of smart long-term care information strategy portfolio decision model: the national healthcare environment in Taiwan

Chih-Hao Yang (), Yen-Chi Chen, Wei Hsu and Yu-Hui Chen
Additional contact information
Chih-Hao Yang: Ming Chuan University
Yen-Chi Chen: National Taipei University of Business
Wei Hsu: National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Yu-Hui Chen: National Defense University

Annals of Operations Research, 2023, vol. 326, issue 1, No 17, 505-536

Abstract: Abstract A globally aging population results in the long-term care of people with chronic illnesses, affecting the living quality of the elderly. Integrating smart technology and long-term care services will enhance and maximize healthcare quality, while planning a smart long-term care information strategy could satisfy the variety of care demands regarding hospitals, home-care institutions, and communities. The evaluation of a smart long-term care information strategy is necessary to develop smart long-term care technology. This study applies a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, which uses the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) integrated with the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for ranking and priority of a smart long-term care information strategy. In addition, this study considers the various resource constraints (budget, network platform cost, training time, labor cost-saving ratio, and information transmission efficiency) into the Zero–one Goal Programming (ZOGP) model to capture the optimal smart long-term care information strategy portfolios. The results of this study indicate that a hybrid MCDM decision model can provide decision-makers with the optimal service platform selection for a smart long-term care information strategy that can maximize information service benefits and allocate constrained resources most efficiently.

Keywords: Smart long-term care information strategy portfolio; Multi-criteria decision making; Analytic network process; Zero–one goal programming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05358-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:326:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05358-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05358-7

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:326:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05358-7