EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How shaky was the regional economy after the 1995 Kobe earthquake? A multiplicative decomposition analysis of disaster impact

Yasuhide Okuyama

The Annals of Regional Science, 2015, vol. 55, issue 2, 289-312

Abstract: The long-run effects of the 1995 Kobe earthquake have been studied in various papers (Chang in Disasters 34(2):303–327, 2010 ; DuPont and Noy in Econ Dev Cult Change, 2015 ; Okuyama in Singap Econ Rev, 2015 ), and their findings have revealed the continuous and significantly negative economic trend in Kobe, suggesting that considerable structural changes occurred in the Kobe economy resulting from the damages from and subsequent reconstruction activities after the earthquake. At the same time, Fujiki and Hsiao (Disentangling the effects of multiple treatments—measuring the net economic impact of the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. IMES Discussion Paper 2013-E-3. Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, 2013 ) concluded that the effects from the event were only short-lived and the persistent decline of the Hyogo economy had come from structural change of the economy. In order to investigate the disaster-induced structural changes further, this paper aimed to analyze the extent to and the composition of the structural change, based on the input–output framework. While the previous study (Okuyama in Econ Syst Res 26(1):98–117, 2014 ) lacked the 1995 data and was inclined toward a longer-run analysis, this paper examined immediate structural changes after the event employing the estimated 1995 input–output tables for the damaged region based on the observed macroeconomic data and with a set of different assumptions (Ashiya and Jinushi in Kokumin Keizai Zasshi 183(1):79–97, 2001 ). The results show that the significant structural changes were observed in the damaged region and that many manufacturing sectors tightened the regional interindustry linkages, whereas service sectors weakened their regional linkages in the aftermath. In addition, the assumptions of how the reconstruction demands would have been leaked out appear to make some critical differences in the results. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Keywords: C67; Q54; R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00168-015-0691-z (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:anresc:v:55:y:2015:i:2:p:289-312

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.com/journal/168

DOI: 10.1007/s00168-015-0691-z

Access Statistics for this article

The Annals of Regional Science is currently edited by Martin Andersson, E. Kim and Janet E. Kohlhase

More articles in The Annals of Regional Science from Springer, Western Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:anresc:v:55:y:2015:i:2:p:289-312