Reverse causality between urbanization and economic growth: a global test on the validity of urbanization-led economic growth

Abdul Shaban (), Karima Kourtit and Peter Nijkamp
Additional contact information
Abdul Shaban: Tata Institute of Social Sciences
Karima Kourtit: Open University (OU)

The Annals of Regional Science, 2024, vol. 73, issue 4, No 5, 1469-1496

Abstract: Abstract In the field of development and spatial-economic literature, urbanization is considered a significant factor that brings about positive changes, stimulating welfare and economic advancement. However, there is a growing body of research that challenges this perspective, questioning the idea that urbanization leads to growth. Consequently, a number of recent studies have discovered limited or minimal evidence supporting the assumed positive impact of cities and urbanization on a nation’s economic development. Our paper begins by considering the concept of “reverse causality” and aims to examine whether economic growth plays a significant role in driving structural urbanization within a country. In the current study, we utilize data spanning from 1971 to 2019 for 106 countries with varying economic levels and demographic dividend groups. We employ an augmented bootstrap panel Granger causality method to investigate the relationship between economic growth and urbanization. Our findings reveal a prevalent unidirectional causality, specifically from economic growth to urbanization, in a significant number of high- and upper-middle-income countries. Conversely, we observe an absence of such causal relationships in low- and lower-middle-income countries, as well as in post, late, and pre-demographic dividend countries. The results of the study suggest that urbanization might serve as more of an indicator rather than a driving force of economic development, as stated by Bloom et al. (Science 319:772–775, 2008). These findings carry important implications for both theoretical understanding and policy-making, particularly for developing countries in the global south that are currently experiencing rapid urbanization. These countries are allocating a significant portion of their resources toward the establishment of new cities and the revitalization of existing ones, potentially at the expense of investments in rural areas, for economic growth. The study’s findings call into question the effectiveness of this approach and strategies in order to strike a balance between urban development and rural investment.

JEL-codes: O47 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-024-01315-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:anresc:v:73:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00168-024-01315-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.com/journal/168

DOI: 10.1007/s00168-024-01315-9

Access Statistics for this article

The Annals of Regional Science is currently edited by Martin Andersson, E. Kim and Janet E. Kohlhase

More articles in The Annals of Regional Science from Springer, Western Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().