EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

National print media vs. agricultural trade publications: communicating the 2012 Midwestern US drought

Sarah P. Church (), Belyna Bentlage (), Roberta Weiner (), Nicholas Babin (), Brian R. Bulla (), Katelyn Fagan (), Tonya Haigh (), J. Stuart Carlton () and Linda S. Prokopy ()
Additional contact information
Sarah P. Church: Montana State University
Belyna Bentlage: Verdis Group
Roberta Weiner: Purdue University
Nicholas Babin: California Polytechnic State University
Brian R. Bulla: Appalachian State University
Katelyn Fagan: Purdue University
Tonya Haigh: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
J. Stuart Carlton: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant
Linda S. Prokopy: Purdue University

Climatic Change, 2020, vol. 161, issue 1, No 4, 43-63

Abstract: Abstract The 2012 Midwestern US drought resulted in major impacts to farmers and the public. Extreme events like drought will continue in the future due to climate change. We studied how the elite national press—New York Times (NYT) and Wall Street Journal (WSJ)—covered the 2012 Midwestern drought, how climate change was addressed, and how NYT and WSJ articles differed from each other and agricultural trade publication (ATP) article coverage before, during, and after the drought. A previous study found that ATP articles emphasized short-term drought recovery efforts. We suggest this emphasis was exacerbated by how drought and climate change were reported in the national media. Few articles discussed climate change in all publication types. Most articles that did cover climate change did not attribute a cause; however, over half of NYT articles mentioned human-caused climate change. WSJ and ATP articles had more content similarities than NYT articles. Overall, climate change discussions in all publication types were related to personal impacts. Climate change reporting in the WSJ and NYT was broad. ATP climate change reporting related to weather conditions in relation to farm resilience. Focusing on impacts and recovery may have attenuated risk perceptions. We contend that communication should recognize human-caused climate change and increased likelihood of weather extremes.

Keywords: The 2012 Midwestern US drought; New York Times; Wall Street Journal; Agricultural trade publications; Climate change communication; Social amplification of risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-019-02630-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:161:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02630-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02630-3

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:161:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10584-019-02630-3