The optimal knowledge creation strategy of organizations in groupthink situations
Namjun Cha (),
Junseok Hwang () and
Eungdo Kim ()
Additional contact information
Namjun Cha: Seoul National University
Junseok Hwang: Seoul National University
Eungdo Kim: Chungbuk National University
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2020, vol. 26, issue 2, No 3, 207-235
Abstract:
Abstract Even though both collective intelligence and groupthink promote concurrence seeking, studies focused on the relationship between the two are lacking. Therefore, this study aims to explore how to transform groupthink into collective intelligence that contributes to knowledge creation. Three “switching factors”— “knowledge conflict,” “reconsideration,” and “organizational memory”—are defined herein. The effects of each factor and combinations of factors were tested through an agent-based model (ABM) and efficiency analysis. The ABM simulation showed that “knowledge conflict” is good for organizational performance but reduces the scope for new knowledge. On the contrary, a model with “reconsideration” or “organizational memory” was able to hold the heterogeneity of knowledge. With respect to efficiency, eight possible strategies were tested by stochastic frontier analysis. Its results showed that the combination of “knowledge conflict” and “reconsideration” had the highest efficiency with respect to both “between-group” and “meta-frontier.” Thus, this study suggests that the switching factors and strategies using their combinations can help in ensuring decentralization and diversity in organizations, and ultimately, contribute to new knowledge creation—specifically, the combination of “knowledge conflict” and “reconsideration” is the most efficient strategy. This study contributes to the possible existence of switching factors and, using them, builds an optimal strategy in the practical field of knowledge management.
Keywords: Groupthink; Collective intelligence; Knowledge management; Agent-based model; Self-organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-020-09313-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:comaot:v:26:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10588-020-09313-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10588
DOI: 10.1007/s10588-020-09313-w
Access Statistics for this article
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory is currently edited by Terrill Frantz and Kathleen Carley
More articles in Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().