Decentralization and rural–urban income inequality: implications for inverted-U hypothesis of Pakistan

Muhammad Shahid (), Khalil Ahmad (), Ayesha Haider () and Safdar Ali ()
Additional contact information
Muhammad Shahid: Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines
Khalil Ahmad: Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines
Ayesha Haider: National College of Business Administration and Economics (NCBA&E)
Safdar Ali: Government Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines

Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2024, vol. 21, issue 2, No 2, 177-197

Abstract: Abstract The decentralization process greatly improves a society's welfare by offering public goods and services. Inequality between rural and urban areas as well as the overall effects of decentralization is examined in this study in Pakistan. In addition, the rural–urban inverted-U hypothesis is investigated for a country-specific focus on Pakistan using a time-series data set spanning the years 1985 to 2020. Using the auto-regressive distributive lag model (ARDL) bounds testing co-integration method, variables are evaluated over the long run and their error correction dynamic is applied to short-run instants of the variables. The study's findings successfully demonstrate the opposite of what is typically found for the implications of rural inequality owing to fiscal decentralization, namely that fiscal decentralization has exacerbated the overall inequality situation in rural and urban Pakistan. Decentralization in politics and administration is more beneficial for enhancing the overall and urban income distribution in Pakistan. Decentralization has, however, affected rural regions' income distribution in both directions. Furthermore, for both the national economy and urban regions, the GDP per capita growth rate and its square support Kuznet's inverted U-shape theory. However, the distribution of income in Pakistan's rural areas does not support this theory.

Keywords: Fiscal decentralization; Political decentralization; Administrative decentralization; Rural–urban income inequality; Level of economic development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 E02 F63 H77 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:21:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-024-00285-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... theory/journal/40844

DOI: 10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z

Access Statistics for this article

Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review is currently edited by Kiichiro Yagi, Yuji Aruka and Takahiro Fujimoto

More articles in Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().