EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The impact of economic growth, population density, and FDI inflows on $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions in BRICTS countries: Does the Kuznets curve exist?

Mohamed Abdouli (), Olfa Kamoun () and Besma Hamdi ()
Additional contact information
Mohamed Abdouli: Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax
Olfa Kamoun: Higher School of Economic and Commercial Sciences of Tunis
Besma Hamdi: Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax

Empirical Economics, 2018, vol. 54, issue 4, No 14, 1717-1742

Abstract: Abstract This study aims at examining the nonlinear influence of economic growth, foreign direct investment, and population density on the environmental degradation in the BRICTS countries from 1990 to 2014. All the variables were found to be stationary based on recent panel unit root tests. On fully applying both static (OLS, FE, and RE) and dynamic (system GMM) panel data approaches, it was found that there is a relationship between $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 -GDP that foregrounds the Kuznets curve for individual cases. In fact, the Kuznets curve is valid in the BRICTS countries. This validation is strengthened through the relationship between $$\hbox {CO}_{2} $$ CO 2 emissions and population density, as well as between $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions and FDI inflows. The overall results showed that the population density and FDI inflows initially increased, which reduced the $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions as the population and FDI inflows reached the threshold level, thus confirming the FDI halo hypothesis (FDI halo). In contrast, the Kuznets curve between $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 emissions and economic growth is not valid. This implies that the increase of economic growth impedes the environmental quality. These empirical insights are of particular interest to policymakers as they help build sound economic and energy conservation policies to support the environment quality.

Keywords: FDI inflows; Economic growth; Population density; Environment; BRICTS countries; O11; O16; P18; Q4; Q55; J11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00181-017-1263-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:empeco:v:54:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-017-1263-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... rics/journal/181/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00181-017-1263-0

Access Statistics for this article

Empirical Economics is currently edited by Robert M. Kunst, Arthur H.O. van Soest, Bertrand Candelon, Subal C. Kumbhakar and Joakim Westerlund

More articles in Empirical Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:empeco:v:54:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00181-017-1263-0