Assessing China’s carbon intensity pledge for 2020: stringency and credibility issues and their implications

Keywords: Carbon intensity; Post-Copenhagen climate change negotiations; Climate commitments; China; Q42; Q43; Q48; Q52; Q53; Q54; Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10018-011-0012-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Assessing China's Carbon Intensity Pledge for 2020: Stringency and Credibility Issues and Their Implications (2010)
Working Paper: Assessing China’s Carbon Intensity Pledge for 2020: Stringency and Credibility Issues and their Implications (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envpol:v:13:y:2011:i:3:p:219-235

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... mental/journal/10018

DOI: 10.1007/s10018-011-0012-4

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies is currently edited by Ken-Ichi Akao

More articles in Environmental Economics and Policy Studies from Springer, Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().