A “solution-focused” comparative risk assessment of conventional and synthetic biology approaches to control mosquitoes carrying the dengue fever virus

Adam M. Finkel (), Benjamin D. Trump, Diana Bowman and Andrew Maynard
Additional contact information
Adam M. Finkel: University of Pennsylvania Law School
Benjamin D. Trump: University of Michigan, School of Public Health
Diana Bowman: Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law
Andrew Maynard: Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, ASU Risk Innovation Lab

Environment Systems and Decisions, 2018, vol. 38, issue 2, 177-197

Abstract: Abstract Emerging technologies often pose various uncertain health risks that cause policymakers to hesitate to allow resultant products and processes to enter the market—but they also may offer large benefits, including the potential to greatly reduce some of the very risks currently most greatly affecting public health and the environment. Synthetic biology serves as one such emerging technology that, despite its potential benefits to various fields, gives policymakers pause until the human and environmental health risks posed by genetically engineered organisms are better characterized and assessed. Given various limitations of our current paradigm for making risk management decisions, some of which are caused by limitations of conventional methods of quantitative risk assessment (QRA), a modified approach to emerging technology characterization and assessment might be a needed step change. This paper demonstrates how one such approach—“solution-focused risk assessment” (Finkel, Hum Ecol Risk Assess 17(4):754–787, 2011)—can help evaluate synthetic biology products against conventional competitors. Specifically, this paper conducts a SFRA for Oxitec’s engineered Aedes aegypti mosquito, which serves as a synthetic biology option for dengue virus vector control.

Keywords: Synthetic biology; Comparative risk assessment; Governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-018-9688-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:38:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-018-9688-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/10669

DOI: 10.1007/s10669-018-9688-3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Environment Systems and Decisions from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().