Shadow banking contraction and innovation efficiency of tech-based SMEs-based on the implementation of China’s New Asset Management Regulation

Ziqin Yu () and Xiang Xiao ()
Additional contact information
Ziqin Yu: Beijing Jiaotong University
Xiang Xiao: Beijing Jiaotong University

Eurasian Business Review, 2022, vol. 12, issue 2, No 3, 275 pages

Abstract: Abstract Tech-based SMEs are important subjects for achieving national innovation-driven development, and it is crucial to study whether and how changes in the macro-institutional environment affect their innovation efficiency. New Asset Management Regulation (NAMR) is a policy promulgated by the Chinese government to address the chaotic expansion of shadow banking in China, and this study treats it as a quasi-natural experiment, selecting a sample of Chinese GEM-listed firms from 2015 to 2019, adopting the event study method and the generalized double difference method, and empirically testing the impact of shadow banking contraction on the innovation efficiency of Chinese tech-based SMEs and its mechanism. This study finds that shadow banking contraction under the NAMR significantly improves innovation efficiency of tech-based SMEs. The mechanism test finds that the NAMR can optimize the debt financing structure of tech-based SMEs, reduce their financing costs and financing risks, and ultimately accelerate their innovation efficiency by improving their financing efficiency, which supports the hypothesis of “financing efficiency view”; it is further found that, to tech-based SMEs, the more they rely on shadow banking and the severer financing constraints they endure, the more obvious NAMR’s effect is on improving innovation efficiency. The findings not only provide some empirical evidence to clarify the controversy of shadow banking in China from the perspective of firm innovation, but also have some implications for the subsequent financial regulatory reform.

Keywords: New Asset Management Regulation; Shadow banking contraction; Innovation efficiency; Financing constraints; Financing efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G21 G38 M19 O31 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40821-021-00201-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s40821-021-00201-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40821

DOI: 10.1007/s40821-021-00201-0

Access Statistics for this article

Eurasian Business Review is currently edited by Marco Vivarelli

More articles in Eurasian Business Review from Springer, Eurasia Business and Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().