Are blockchain-based digital transformation and ecosystem-based business models mutually reinforcing? The principal-agent conflict perspective
Ilya Ivaninskiy () and
Irina Ivashkovskaya
Additional contact information
Ilya Ivaninskiy: HSE University
Eurasian Business Review, 2022, vol. 12, issue 4, No 2, 643-670
Abstract:
Abstract This paper explores the implications of digitalization and business model innovation for the principal-agent conflict. Continuous digital transformation has recently become a feature sine qua non for companies. It is also stimulating business model innovation resulting in the growing adoption of ecosystem-based models. These trends may have significant implications for the principal-agent relationship, essential for understanding value creation by a firm. In order to analyze the impact of digital transformation, we use blockchain technology as a proxy. To measure the potential impact on the principal-agent conflict, we study management and shareholder-sponsored proposals at annual meetings. The level of shareholder involvement in governance is measured based on the number of shareholder-sponsored proposals received. In addition, we measure shareholder support for management-sponsored proposals. A sample of 2481 NYSE, Nasdaq and AMEX-traded firms for the period 2015–2019 is used. First of all, we show that digitalization per se has a mitigating impact on the agency conflict. Shareholders become more active, albeit not more hostile towards management. Secondly, we have identified the strongest impact in such sectors as information technology, communications, finance, and healthcare. These are the most significantly impacted by ecosystem-based business model innovation. We conclude that digitalization and ecosystem-based business models are mutually reinforcing in mitigating the principal-agent conflict.
Keywords: Corporate governance; Digital transformation; Ecosystems; Corporate voting; Shareholder activism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40821-022-00209-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:12:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s40821-022-00209-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40821
DOI: 10.1007/s40821-022-00209-0
Access Statistics for this article
Eurasian Business Review is currently edited by Marco Vivarelli
More articles in Eurasian Business Review from Springer, Eurasia Business and Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().