A novel fuzzy decision-making approach to pension fund investments in renewable energy

Serhat Yüksel (), Serkan Eti (), Hasan Dinçer (), Hasan Meral (), Muhammad Umar () and Yaşar Gökalp ()
Additional contact information
Serhat Yüksel: İstanbul Medipol University
Serkan Eti: İstanbul Medipol University
Hasan Dinçer: İstanbul Medipol University
Hasan Meral: Marmara University
Muhammad Umar: Lebanese American University
Yaşar Gökalp: İstanbul Medipol University

Financial Innovation, 2025, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-24

Abstract: Abstract Pension fund must consider some significant issues when making renewable energy project investment decisions. It is necessary to determine the most important factors and prioritize the indicators. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to conduct a priority analysis of the determinants of investment in renewable energy projects by pension funds. This study constructs a novel fuzzy decision-making model. First, five indicators for this process are weighted using an entropy methodology based on sine trigonometric Pythagorean fuzzy sets. The CRITIC methodology is also considered to make a comparative evaluation. Second, five different clean energy investment alternatives for pension funds are ranked using the RATGOS methodology. Similarly, this ranking analysis is also made by considering TOPSIS technique to check the reliability of the results. The main contribution of this study is the creation of a new and comprehensive fuzzy decision-making model to identify the most important factors in renewable energy project investments for pension funds. The proposed model uses the RATGOS technique to rank clean energy investment alternatives for pension funds. By considering the geometrical mean in the RATGOS calculation process, criticisms related to existing ranking techniques can be overcome. The use of sine trigonometric Pythagorean fuzzy numbers provides significant benefits to the quality of the proposed decision-making model. The defuzzification process can be implemented appropriately using these sets. Therefore, this study’s findings pave the way for investors to make investment decisions under these circumstances. It is concluded that the most important criterion is risk minimization. Effective regulations are another critical issue. Furthermore, the ranking results indicate that the most suitable renewable energy alternative is green bonds. The comparative results with STPFY-TOPSIS show that the proposed model generates coherent and reliable findings. Graphical abstract

Keywords: Pension funds; Financial innovation; Energy investments; Clean energy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-024-00703-6 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-024-00703-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nomics/journal/40589

DOI: 10.1186/s40854-024-00703-6

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Innovation is currently edited by J. Leon Zhao and Zongyi

More articles in Financial Innovation from Springer, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().