Effects of Knowledge Management Processes by Strategic Management Accounting on Organizational Ambidexterity: Mediation of Operational Processes Under Environmental Dynamism

Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni, Rajeev Dwivedi (), Marcio Quadros Lopes Santos, Ronaldo Fragoso, Anderson Costa Souza, Fabio Henrique Sousa, Wagner Argibe Pio Santos and Denise Souza Romboli
Additional contact information
Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Rajeev Dwivedi: Eastern Washington University
Marcio Quadros Lopes Santos: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Ronaldo Fragoso: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Anderson Costa Souza: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Fabio Henrique Sousa: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Wagner Argibe Pio Santos: Mackenzie Presbyterian University
Denise Souza Romboli: Mackenzie Presbyterian University

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2024, vol. 25, issue 3, No 5, 513-532

Abstract: Abstract An important question for scholars and professionals is how knowledge management processes (KMP) supported by strategic management accounting (SMA) can strengthen operational processes (OPs) to enhance organizational ambidexterity (OA) in dynamic environments (ED). The empirical research utilizes knowledge management practices (KMPs) including knowledge generation, storage, and application/sharing to develop organizational performance (OP) and utilize organizational agility (OA) inside an environment of disruption (ED). The research involved surveying 203 Brazilian businesses and examining the assumptions through structural equation modeling. The findings showed that knowledge development and knowledge storage impact knowledge application and sharing. Knowledge application and sharing, as a strategic information system, impacts organizational ambidexterity by completely mediating organizational performance. Post hoc study revealed three enterprise clusters with varying levels of adoption of competitive orientation strategy, assistance from business partner accountants, and features of companies showing diverse knowledge management process roles on organizational performance and organizational ambidexterity under low and high environmental dynamism. The research results address gaps in information related to knowledge management procedures, strategic management accounting, and organizational ambidexterity literature, offering practical implications for professionals.

Keywords: Environmental dynamism; Knowledge management processes; Operational processes; Organizational ambidexterity; Organizational flexibility; Strategic management accounting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-024-00398-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00398-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/40171

DOI: 10.1007/s40171-024-00398-9

Access Statistics for this article

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management is currently edited by Sushil

More articles in Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management from Springer, Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().