EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do Self-Reported Strategies Match Actual Behavior in a Social Preference Experiment?

Rudolf Vetschera () and Guenther Kainz ()
Additional contact information
Rudolf Vetschera: University of Vienna
Guenther Kainz: University of Vienna

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, vol. 22, issue 5, No 1, 823-849

Abstract: Abstract According to many models, social preferences are influenced by properties of payoff distributions like the payoff to the group member who is worst off, or higher payoffs to other members possibly causing envy. In this paper, we explore if subjects in a social preference experiment consciously take these elements into account. To study this question, we performed an experiment in which subjects stated indifference values of unequal payoff distributions, and explicitly reported on the strategies they used in stating these values. This approach allows us to obtain a cardinal measure of their social preferences, and to study the impact both of subject characteristics and stated strategies on these values. Our results indicate that although experimental factors, like group composition or field of study of subjects, are significantly related to self-reported strategies, they barely have a statistically significant impact on the indifference values given. On the other hand, we find highly significant relationships between self-reported strategies and actual behavior. Furthermore, our results indicate that the salience of different payoff distribution characteristics, and the impact of different motives on actual decisions, is context dependent.

Keywords: Social preferences; Self-reported strategies; Content analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-012-9295-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9295-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9295-5

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:22:y:2013:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-012-9295-5