Hypothesis Tests for Principal Component Analysis When Variables are Standardized

Johannes Forkman (), Julie Josse () and Hans-Peter Piepho ()
Additional contact information
Johannes Forkman: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Julie Josse: CMAP UMR 7641 École Polytechnique INRIA-XPOP CNRS
Hans-Peter Piepho: University of Hohenheim

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2019, vol. 24, issue 2, No 6, 289-308

Abstract: Abstract In principal component analysis (PCA), the first few principal components possibly reveal interesting systematic patterns in the data, whereas the last may reflect random noise. The researcher may wonder how many principal components are statistically significant. Many methods have been proposed for determining how many principal components to retain in the model, but most of these assume non-standardized data. In agricultural, biological and environmental applications, however, standardization is often required. This article proposes parametric bootstrap methods for hypothesis testing of principal components when variables are standardized. Unlike previously proposed methods, the proposed parametric bootstrap methods do not rely on any asymptotic results requiring large dimensions. In a simulation study, the proposed parametric bootstrap methods for standardized data were compared with parallel analysis for PCA and methods using the Tracy–Widom distribution. Parallel analysis performed well when testing the first principal component, but was much too conservative when testing higher-order principal components not reflecting random noise. When variables are standardized, the Tracy–Widom distribution may not approximate the distribution of the largest eigenvalue. The proposed parametric bootstrap methods maintained the level of significance approximately and were up to twice as powerful as the methods using the Tracy–Widom distribution. SAS and R computer code is provided for the recommended methods. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online

Keywords: Dimensionality reduction; GGE; Parallel analysis; Parametric bootstrap; Principal component analysis; Tracy–Widom distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-019-00355-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-019-00355-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/13253

DOI: 10.1007/s13253-019-00355-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics is currently edited by Stephen Buckland

More articles in Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics from Springer, The International Biometric Society, American Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().