EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Explanatory and predictive power of the adaptive learning model: average and heterogeneous behavior in a newsvendor context

Christian Köster () and Heike Y. Schenk-Mathes
Additional contact information
Christian Köster: Clausthal University of Technology
Heike Y. Schenk-Mathes: Clausthal University of Technology

Journal of Business Economics, 2016, vol. 86, issue 4, No 3, 387 pages

Abstract: Abstract The newsvendor problem is an economic decision problem with an interesting degree of complexity while still providing a quite simple and intuitive normative solution. Therefore, one should expect that decision makers find the optimal solution at least when they learn over time and become familiar with the problem. However, this is not the case. On average, decision makers in newsvendor settings tend to order too little when confronted with high-profit goods and too much in the case of low-profit goods. This inefficiency is well documented through a variety of laboratory experiments assuming symmetric demand functions and is known as pull-to-mean effect. We analyze data from an experiment that is based on an asymmetric demand function and are able to discriminate among the possible focal points, namely, mean demand, median demand, and the middle of possible demand. Interestingly, the result is not a pure pull-to-mean effect. We show that the adaptive learning model is able to better explain the ordering behavior than the models of anchoring and insufficient adjustment, demand chasing, the regretting newsvendor, reference dependence, or bounded rationality not only on the aggregate but also on the individual level. In particular, we find out that the top ranking of the adaptive learning model is not the result of mixing individual behavior according to the explanatory models with less parameters. Furthermore, we are able to improve the explanatory and predictive power of the adaptive learning model by modifying the demand indicator that is used.

Keywords: Adaptive learning; Experimental economics; Individual decision making; Behavioral operations management; Newsvendor problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 M11 M21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-016-0814-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:86:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11573-016-0814-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11573

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-016-0814-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Economics is currently edited by Günter Fandel

More articles in Journal of Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:86:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11573-016-0814-8