A real option application for emission control measures

Carmen Schiel (), Simon Glöser-Chahoud and Frank Schultmann
Additional contact information
Carmen Schiel: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Chair of Business Administration, Production and Operations Management
Simon Glöser-Chahoud: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Chair of Business Administration, Production and Operations Management
Frank Schultmann: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Chair of Business Administration, Production and Operations Management

Journal of Business Economics, 2019, vol. 89, issue 3, No 3, 325 pages

Abstract: Abstract Real Option analyses are broadly discussed in economics and finance and different analytic and numeric calculation methods for option values have been presented and successfully implemented in theoretical case studies and practical applications. However, real option analysis has not yet been applied for mandatory investments without monetary revenues, e.g. investments in pollution reduction and emission control installations in large industrial plants enforced by political regulation. The assessment of the timing of the investment, i.e. whether to invest immediately or to delay the investment in the future, is the main scope of this work. A difficulty of the underlying type of investments with regard to option valuation is that not to invest is not an option. Therefore, the frequently applied optimal stopping approaches based on investment thresholds are not applicable to this work. In the first part of the paper, specific features and characteristics of the regarded investments are analyzed and translated into financial terms of option valuation, accompanied by an overview of several relevant option valuation methods. The most appropriate methodology for the application, the Monte-Carlo-Analysis, will be assessed in more detail. Based on a two perspectives approach that analyzes possible savings and losses of a delayed investment, a case study displays the calculations and results of the developed methodology in several scenarios. The case study reveals possible influences of policy schemes and the impact of the degree of uncertainty on mandatory investments. The work has a strong methodological focus and the calculation methodology provided can be of use for investors and policy-makers, particularly with regard to investment decision-making in the real options framework and the design of political instruments such as funding schemes.

Keywords: Real option analysis; Monte-Carlo-Simulation; Emission abatement; Investment decision; Environmental investment; G11; G17; G38; M21; Q48; Q53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11573-018-0913-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:89:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11573-018-0913-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11573

DOI: 10.1007/s11573-018-0913-9

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Economics is currently edited by Günter Fandel

More articles in Journal of Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().