Should firms invest more in marketing or R&D to maintain sales leadership? An empirical analysis of sales leader firms
Gautham Vadakkepatt,
Venkatesh Shankar () and
Rajan Varadarajan
Additional contact information
Gautham Vadakkepatt: George Mason University
Venkatesh Shankar: Center for Retailing Studies
Rajan Varadarajan: Texas A&M University
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2021, vol. 49, issue 6, No 3, 1088-1108
Abstract:
Abstract Some firms have successfully maintained their position as sales leaders for years, as evidenced by their presence on the annual Fortune 500 list. While sustained investments in both marketing and R&D are crucial to sales leadership maintenance, should firms invest more in marketing or R&D? Is the relative emphasis on marketing versus R&D for sales leadership maintenance contingent upon environmental and firm-related factors? We address these questions by building on resource-based and organizational adaptation theories. We present a conceptual model and hypotheses delineating the main effects of marketing and R&D capital, and the moderating effects of environmental dynamism, environmental munificence, and financial leverage on sales leadership maintenance. We use a left-truncated Cox proportional hazards survival model to test the hypotheses on an unbalanced panel dataset of 114 Fortune 500 manufacturing firms tracked over the period 1981 to 2016. We find that both marketing capital and R&D capital have a direct and positive effect on sales leadership maintenance. We also find that environmental dynamism and financial leverage interact with R&D capital, but not marketing capital, to enhance the probability of sales leadership maintenance; and investing more in R&D than in marketing enhances sales leadership maintenance in dynamic environments for highly leveraged firms. A sales leader firm that incrementally spends 1% of its five-year average sales revenue on each of marketing and R&D activities can improve its probability of sales leadership maintenance by 50%.
Keywords: Strategy; R&D capital; Marketing capital; Sales leader; Resource-based theory; Organizational adaptation theory; Survival analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-021-00774-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:49:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-021-00774-2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... gement/journal/11747
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-021-00774-2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science is currently edited by John Hulland, Anne Hoekman and Mark Houston
More articles in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().