Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls

Michael Samudra, Carla Van Riet (), Erik Demeulemeester, Brecht Cardoen, Nancy Vansteenkiste and Frank E. Rademakers
Additional contact information
Michael Samudra: KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business
Carla Van Riet: KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business
Erik Demeulemeester: KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business
Brecht Cardoen: KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business
Nancy Vansteenkiste: University hospital Leuven
Frank E. Rademakers: University hospital Leuven

Journal of Scheduling, 2016, vol. 19, issue 5, No 1, 493-525

Abstract: Abstract In hospitals, the operating room (OR) is a particularly expensive facility and thus efficient scheduling is imperative. This can be greatly supported by using advanced methods that are discussed in the academic literature. In order to help researchers and practitioners to select new relevant articles, we classify the recent OR planning and scheduling literature into tables regarding patient type, used performance measures, decisions made, OR up- and downstream facilities, uncertainty, research methodology and testing phase. Based on these classifications, we identify trends and promising topics. Additionally, we recognize three common pitfalls that hamper the adoption of research results by stakeholders: the lack of a clear choice of authors on whether to target researchers (contributing advanced methods) or practitioners (providing managerial insights), the use of ill-fitted performance measures in models and the failure to understandably report on the hospital setting and method-related assumptions. We provide specific guidelines that help to avoid these pitfalls. First, we show how to build up an article based on the choice of the target group (i.e., researchers or practitioners). Making a clear distinction between target groups impacts the problem setting, the research task, the reported findings, and the conclusions. Second, we discuss points that need to be considered by researchers when deciding on the used performance measures. Third, we list the assumptions that need to be included in articles in order to enable readers to decide whether the presented research is relevant to them.

Keywords: Health care management; Surgery scheduling; Operating room planning; Review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-016-0489-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jsched:v:19:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s10951-016-0489-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10951

DOI: 10.1007/s10951-016-0489-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Scheduling is currently edited by Edmund Burke and Michael Pinedo

More articles in Journal of Scheduling from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().