Who should bear the cost of China’s carbon emissions embodied in goods for exports?

ZhongXiang Zhang

Mineral Economics, 2012, vol. 24, issue 2, 103-117

Abstract: China’s capital-intensive, export-oriented, spectacular economic growth since launching its open-door policy and economic reforms in late 1978 not only has created jobs and has lifted millions of the Chinese people out of poverty, but also has given rise to unprecedented environmental pollution and CO 2 emissions. While estimates of the embedded CO 2 emissions in China’s trade differ, both single-country studies for China and global studies show a hefty chunk of China’s CO 2 emissions embedded in trade. This portion of CO 2 emissions had helped to turn China into the world’s largest carbon emitter, and is further widening its gap with the second largest emitter. This raises the issue of who should be responsible for this portion of emissions and bearing the carbon cost of exports. China certainly wants importers to cover some, if not all, of that costs. While China’s stance is understandable, this paper has argued from a broad and balanced perspective that if this is pushed too far, it will not help to find solutions to this issue. On the contrary, it can be to China’s disadvantage for a number of reasons. However, aligning this responsibility with China does not necessarily suggest the sole reliance on domestic actions. In that context, the paper recommends specific actions that need to be taken internationally as well as domestically in order to effectively control the embedded CO 2 emissions in China’s trade. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2012

Keywords: Carbon emissions embodied in trade; Consumption-based accounting; Production-based accounting; Processing trade; Carbon tariffs; Energy policy; F18; P28; Q42; Q43; Q48; Q53; Q54; Q56; Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s13563-011-0012-7 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Should Bear the Cost of China’s Carbon Emissions Embodied in Goods for Exports? (2011)
Working Paper: Who Should Bear the Cost of China’s Carbon Emissions Embodied in Goods for Exports? (2011)
Working Paper: Who Should Bear the Cost of China's Carbon Emissions Embodied in Goods for Exports? (2011)
Working Paper: Who Should Bear the Costs of China's Carbon Emissions Embodied in Goods for Export? (2011)
Working Paper: Who Should Bear the Cost of China’s Carbon Emissions Embodied in Goods for Exports? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:minecn:v:24:y:2012:i:2:p:103-117

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13563

DOI: 10.1007/s13563-011-0012-7

Access Statistics for this article

Mineral Economics is currently edited by Magnus Ericsson and Patrik Söderholm

More articles in Mineral Economics from Springer, Raw Materials Group (RMG), Luleå University of Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().