EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multivariate fire risk models using copula regression in Kalimantan, Indonesia

Mohamad Khoirun Najib (), Sri Nurdiati and Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan
Additional contact information
Mohamad Khoirun Najib: IPB University
Sri Nurdiati: IPB University
Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan: Center for Applied Climate Services, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2022, vol. 113, issue 2, No 18, 1263-1283

Abstract: Abstract Forest fires have become a national issue yearly and elicited serious attention from the government and researchers in Indonesia. Copula-based joint distribution can construct a fire risk model to improve the early warning system of forest fires, especially in Kalimantan. This study models and analyzes the copula-based joint distribution between climate conditions and hotspots. Several climate conditions, such as total precipitation, dry spells, and El Nino–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), are used. The joint distributions are constructed using rotated a.k.a. reflected copula functions with reduced sample size according to ENSO conditions, and the copula regression model is employed to estimate the fire size. The marginal distribution is selected by inference of function for margin method using the Anderson–Darling hypothesis test, while root-mean-squared error (RMSE), Akaike’s information criterion, and the Cramer–von Mises hypothesis test are employed to select the fittest copula function. Results show that the probability of extreme hotspots during normal ENSO conditions is rare and almost near zero during La Nina. Moreover, extreme hotspot events (more severe than in 2019) during El Nino are more sensitive to total precipitation than dry spells according to the conditional survival function. The copula regression model used dry spells as a climate condition better than total precipitation, with the RMSE value of 1110 hotspots and the $${R}^{2}$$ R 2 value of 73.02%. A total of 95% confidence interval of the expected hotspots can cover all actual hotspot data in this model.

Keywords: Dry spells; ENSO; Hotspot; Precipitation; Rotated copula; Wildfire (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05346-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05346-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05346-3

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:113:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05346-3