Which is more hazardous: avalanche, landslide, or mudslide?

X.-Z. Xu (), Z.-Y. Liu, W.-L. Wang, H.-W. Zhang, Q. Yan, C. Zhao and W.-Z. Guo

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 2015, vol. 76, issue 3, 1939-1945

Abstract: Gravity erosion is a dominant geomorphic process on the steep loess slopes. Here, we conducted rainfall simulation experiments to monitor occurrence and behavior of the mass failure on steep loess slopes. The results show that the quantity of soil loss caused by avalanche and landslide was much more than that caused by mudslide, and the avalanche was the most violent gravity erosion. As the slopes were eroded with five runs of rainfalls each at an amount of 48 mm, the total volume of avalanche, landslide, and mudslide were 150.9, 82.5, and 3.9 × 10 3 cm 3 /m, and their maximum individual amounts were 369.9, 177.6, and 24.6 × 10 3 cm 3 , respectively. The amount of avalanche, landslide, and mudslide accounted for 62, 36, and 2 % of the total gravity erosion in a rainfall experiment of the model test. Furthermore, the slope height and gradient had a remarkable impact on the erosion amount. When the slope height was increased from 1.0 to 1.5 m, the total amount of avalanche was increased by 22 %, and the maximum volume of individual avalanche was augmented by 165 %. When the slope gradient was increased from 70° to 80°, the total amount of landslide was enlarged by 52 %, and the maximum amount of individual avalanche was magnified by 65 %. As a result, avalanche and landslide, especially the former, played a crucial role of soil erosion on steep slope compacted by hand with loess. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Keywords: Mass failure; Behavior; Role; Trigger; Loess Plateau (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1570-0 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:76:y:2015:i:3:p:1939-1945

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11069

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1570-0

Access Statistics for this article

Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards is currently edited by Thomas Glade, Tad S. Murty and Vladimír Schenk

More articles in Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards from Springer, International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().