How Do Respondents Interpret and View the EQ-VAS? A Qualitative Study of Three Asian Populations

Rachel Lee-Yin Tan (), Zhihao Yang (), Ataru Igarashi (), Michael Herdman () and Nan Luo ()
Additional contact information
Rachel Lee-Yin Tan: National University of Singapore
Zhihao Yang: Guizhou Medical University
Ataru Igarashi: The University of Tokyo
Michael Herdman: Office of Health Economics
Nan Luo: National University of Singapore

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, vol. 14, issue 2, No 10, 283-293

Abstract: Abstract Background This study aimed to understand how respondents from three Asian countries interpret and perceive the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Method Data were from a project that aimed to examine the cultural appropriateness of EQ-5D in Asia. Members of the general public from China, Japan, and Singapore were interviewed one-to-one in their preferred languages. Open-ended questions (e.g. What does “best imaginable health” mean to you?) were used to elicit participants’ interpretation of the labels of EQ-VAS. How the scale could be improved was also probed. Thematic and content analyses were performed separately for each country before pooling for comparison. Results Sixty Chinese, 24 Japanese, and 60 Singaporeans were interviewed. Interpretations of the label “Best Imaginable Health” varied among the participants. Interestingly, some participants indicated that “Best Imaginable Health” is unachievable. Interpretations for “Worst Imaginable Health” also varied, with participants referring primarily to one of three themes, namely, “death,” “disease,” and “disability.” There were different opinions as to what changes in health would correspond to a 5- to 10-point change on the EQ-VAS. While participants opined that EQ-VAS is easy to understand, some criticized it for being too granular and that scale labels are open to interpretation. Findings from the three countries were similar. Conclusion It appears that interpretations of the EQ-VAS vary across Asian respondents. Future studies should investigate whether the variations are associated with any respondent characteristics and whether the EQ-VAS could be modified to achieve better respondent acceptance.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00452-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00452-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00452-5

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().