Psychometric Evaluation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Symptom Diary for Varicose Veins: VVSymQ® Instrument

David D. I. Wright (), Jean Paty (), Diane M. Turner-Bowker and Andrew Bradbury
Additional contact information
David D. I. Wright: BTG International, Ltd.
Jean Paty: ERT
Diane M. Turner-Bowker: ERT
Andrew Bradbury: University of Birmingham, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, vol. 9, issue 4, No 6, 335-348

Abstract: Abstract Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties of the VVSymQ® instrument, a new 5-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for symptoms of varicose veins. Method The VVSymQ® electronic daily diary was administered to outpatients who received routine treatment for varicose veins (N = 40). Compliance with diary administration and item score variability, reliability, construct validity, sensitivity to change, and clinically meaningful change were evaluated. Results Patients completed >97 % of scheduled diary assessments (at screening, baseline, and week 8). The VVSymQ® instrument captured patients’ pre-treatment symptoms (all VVSymQ® symptoms were endorsed by ≥75 % of patients at baseline), and the change post-treatment (mean change in score −6.1), with a large Cohen effect size (1.6). Test–retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.96); internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.76; baseline, week 8). VVSymQ® scores were more strongly associated with PRO scores that reflect symptoms and symptom impact (the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study—Quality of Life/Symptoms [VEINES-QOL/Sym] instrument and the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [CIVIQ-20]) than with PRO scores that reflect appearance (the Patient Self-Assessment of Appearance of Visible Varicose Veins [PA-V3]) or clinician-reported outcome scores (the Clinical–Etiology–Anatomy–Pathophysiology [CEAP] Classification of Venous Disorders and Venous Clinical Severity Score [VCSS]), demonstrating construct validity. Patients reporting that symptoms were “moderately” or “much improved” on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) anchor (i.e., >97 % of patients) had mean improvements of −6.3 VVSymQ® points, while a cumulative distribution curve showed that 50 % of patients improved by ≥−5.8 points; thus, a score change of approximately −6 demonstrated a clinically meaningful change in this study. The clinically meaningful change in the VVSymQ® score was greater in patients with a greater baseline VVSymQ® symptom burden, and the VVSymQ® instrument captured clinically meaningful treatment benefit even in patients with a low baseline symptom burden. Conclusion The 5-item VVSymQ® instrument is a brief, psychometrically sound, useful tool for evaluating patient-reported varicose veins symptoms.

Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-015-0159-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40271

DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0159-3

Access Statistics for this article

The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research is currently edited by Christopher I. Carswell

More articles in The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research from Springer, International Academy of Health Preference Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().