Rising Economic Burden of Renal Cell Carcinoma among Elderly Patients in the USA: Part II—An Updated Analysis of SEER-Medicare Data
Ya-Chen Shih,
Ying Xu,
Chun-Ru Chien,
Bumyang Kim,
Yu Shen,
Liang Li and
Daniel M. Geynisman
Additional contact information
Ying Xu: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chun-Ru Chien: China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital
Bumyang Kim: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Yu Shen: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Liang Li: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Daniel M. Geynisman: Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health
PharmacoEconomics, 2019, vol. 37, issue 12, No 7, 1495-1507
Abstract:
Abstract Background The influx of new oncologic technologies has changed the treatment landscape of renal cell carcincoma (RCC) in the last decade. This study updated a previously published paper on the economic burden of RCC in the USA by using more recent data to examine the impact of various forms of new oncologic technologies on the economic burden of RCC. Methods Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we employed prevalence and incidence costing approaches to estimate RCC costs from the payer’s perspective. We conducted a longitudinal analysis of cost data per patient per month for a prevalence cohort of patients with RCC to determine which category of new technology (surgery, radiation, or cancer drugs) was the major cost driver for RCC. We then applied the incidence costing approach to estimate costs related to RCC by care phase (initial, continuing, and terminal) and compared costs between two incidence cohorts to examine how new technology affected the economic burden of RCC over time. Results After controlling for demographic factors, clinical characteristics, neighborhood socioeconomic status, and time trend, we found that rising per patient per month costs were driven by new technologies in cancer drugs. Incidence-based analysis showed the annual net cost (2018 US$) for patients with distant-stage RCC diagnosed between 2002 and 2006 was $51,639, $19,025, $76,603, and $29,045 for the initial, continuing (year 1), terminal (died from RCC), and terminal (died from other causes) care phases, respectively. Costs increased to $70,703, $34,716, $107,989, and $47,538, respectively, for the incidence cohort diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. Conclusion The rising economic burden of RCC was most pronounced among patients with distant-stage RCC, and driven primarily by new cancer drugs.
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-019-00824-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharme:v:37:y:2019:i:12:d:10.1007_s40273-019-00824-2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40273
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00824-2
Access Statistics for this article
PharmacoEconomics is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher I. Carswell
More articles in PharmacoEconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().