Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Siltuximab for Australian Public Investment in the Rare Condition Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease
Francis Shupo,
Keith R. Abrams,
Zanfina Ademi,
Grace Wayi-Wayi,
Natasa Zibelnik,
Matt Kirchmann,
Carolyn Rutherford and
Kelly Makarounas-Kirchmann ()
Additional contact information
Francis Shupo: EUSA Pharma UK (LTD.)
Keith R. Abrams: Visible Analytics Limited
Zanfina Ademi: Monash University
Grace Wayi-Wayi: EUSA Pharma UK (LTD.)
Natasa Zibelnik: EUSA Pharma UK (LTD.)
Matt Kirchmann: KMC Healthcare
Carolyn Rutherford: KMC Healthcare
Kelly Makarounas-Kirchmann: KMC Healthcare
PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2023, vol. 7, issue 5, No 7, 777-792
Abstract:
Abstract Objectives This paper presents an Australian model that formed part of the health technology assessment for public investment in siltuximab for the rare condition of idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (iMCD) in Australia. Methods Two literature reviews were conducted to identify the appropriate comparator and model structure. Survival gain based on available clinical trial data were modelled using an Excel-based model semi-Markov model including time-varying transition probabilities, an adjustment for trial crossover and long-term data. A 20-year horizon was taken, and an Australian healthcare system perspective was adopted, with both benefits and costs discounted at 5%. The model was informed with an inclusive stakeholder approach that included a review of the model by an independent economist, Australian clinical expert opinion and feedback from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). The price used in the economic evaluation reflects a confidential discounted price, which was agreed to with the PBAC. Results An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of A$84,935 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained was estimated. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of A$100,000 per QALY, siltuximab has a 72.1% probability of being cost-effective compared with placebo and best supportive care. Sensitivity analyses results were most sensitive to the length of interval between administrations (from 3- to 6-weekly) and crossover adjustments. Conclusion Within a collaborative and inclusive stakeholder framework, the model submitted to the Australian PBAC found siltuximab to be cost-effective for the treatment of iMCD.
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00426-x Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00426-x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/adis/journal/41669
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00426-x
Access Statistics for this article
PharmacoEconomics - Open is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson and Christopher Carswell
More articles in PharmacoEconomics - Open from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().