Ideological diversity in standard setting
Jivas Chakravarthy ()
Additional contact information
Jivas Chakravarthy: Chapman University
Review of Accounting Studies, 2019, vol. 24, issue 1, No 3, 113-155
Abstract:
Abstract I compare voting positions taken by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) members on standards to positions taken by constituent sponsors in comment letters both before and after the emergence of the FASB’s conceptual framework. I find that, relative to the Pre-CF regime (1973–1986), FASB members in the CF regime (1987–2007) take positions that are (i) less like their constituent sponsors and (ii) more like one another. Both shifts are associated with standards increasing accounting relevance; in the CF regime, such standards are likely a product of the framework’s broad focus on decision usefulness. From 1996 to 2007, all but one dissenting vote on fair value standards explicitly argues for an even greater use of fair values, while none argue for less use. To the extent standard-setters’ idiosyncratic ideologies influence their voting positions, the evidence is consistent with a decline in the level of ideological diversity among FASB members.
Keywords: Accounting standards; Conceptual framework; Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB); Ideology; Standard setting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 G18 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-018-9478-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:24:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-018-9478-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/accounting/journal/11142
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-018-9478-7
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Accounting Studies is currently edited by Paul Fischer
More articles in Review of Accounting Studies from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().