The Functions and Dysfunctions of College Rankings: An Analysis of Institutional Expenditure

Jeongeun Kim ()
Additional contact information
Jeongeun Kim: Arizona State University

Research in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 59, issue 1, No 3, 54-87

Abstract: Abstract College rankings have become a powerful influence in higher education. While the determinants of educational quality are not clearly defined, college rankings designate an institution’s standing in a numerical order based on quantifiable measurements that focus primarily on institutional resources. Previous research has identified the “functions” of rankings: higher ranking positions benefit institutions via admissions outcomes, resource attainment, and future reputation. On the other hand, this positive association between rankings and resource attainment has increased concerns among higher education community about “dysfunctions” of rankings. Rankings may encourage colleges and universities to spend more, moving resources from educational activities to research, amenities and facilities, and administrative expenditures. Filling the gap in the literature in empirically evaluating this hypothesis, this study examined the effect of ranking systems on resource allocation using U.S. News and World Report’s Best Colleges rankings. The numerical ranking resulted in an expansion in both educational and noneducational activities expenditures, including the escalation of student and academic services expenditures. Instruction expenditure was the major area in which institutions altered resource allocation in response to the distinctive nature of ranking systems, the numerical rankings and arbitrary groupings. These patterns were manifested differently among schools categorized as National Universities and those categorized as National Liberal Arts Colleges. The findings from this study provide important implications for understanding the role of college rankings that reinforce the resource-based view of institutional quality and institutional responses, as well as its ramifications to the missions of higher education.

Keywords: College rankings; Resource allocation; Institutional strategy; Prestige; Differences–in–differences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-017-9455-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:reihed:v:59:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11162-017-9455-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11162

DOI: 10.1007/s11162-017-9455-1

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Higher Education is currently edited by Robert K. Toutkoushian

More articles in Research in Higher Education from Springer, Association for Institutional Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().