Approximating relatedness from a business model perspective: towards a taxonomic approach

Adrian Lüthge (), Ulrich Pidun () and Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß ()
Additional contact information
Adrian Lüthge: Technische Universität Berlin
Ulrich Pidun: Technische Universität Berlin
Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß: Technische Universität Berlin

Review of Managerial Science, 2021, vol. 15, issue 3, No 10, 813-846

Abstract: Abstract Despite sustained scholarly efforts for almost half a century, the definition and measurement of “relatedness” as a key concept in diversification research are impeded by a whole bunch of conceptual and methodical limitations. This article attempts to rectify three major concerns voiced by diversification scholars. First, the distinction between industries, devised in the industrial era, is blurring in today’s business environment, making their use for the study of diversification problematic. Second, most conceptualizations of relatedness employ a particularistic perspective and are thus bound to miss central aspects that are outside the scope of their theoretical vantage point. Third, the increasingly pervasive consensus that relatedness should be viewed as a multifaceted construct has not been adequately captured so far. To overcome these limitations, this study draws on the burgeoning concept of the business model as a new and more meaningful way to capture relatedness. The viability of the resulting construct, business model relatedness, is explored both conceptually and by a first empirical test. This study contributes to two theoretical strands of literature: In the field of diversification, it proposes an innovative way to conceptualize relatedness that is based on a taxonomic—as opposed to a typological—approach and that promises to better reflect firms’ actual diversification logics; in business model research, it introduces a novel approach to investigating the performance implications of managing multiple business models.

Keywords: Relatedness; Diversification; Business model; Classification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L25 M10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-019-00375-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11846-019-00375-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/business/journal/11846

DOI: 10.1007/s11846-019-00375-y

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Managerial Science is currently edited by R. Ewert and W. Kürsten

More articles in Review of Managerial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().