Confirmatory composite analysis using partial least squares: setting the record straight
Florian Schuberth ()
Additional contact information
Florian Schuberth: University of Twente
Review of Managerial Science, 2021, vol. 15, issue 5, No 7, 1345 pages
Abstract:
Abstract Confirmatory composite analysis (CCA) is a subtype of structural equation modeling that assesses composite models. Composite models consist of a set of interrelated emergent variables, i.e., constructs which emerge as linear combinations of other variables. Only recently, Hair et al. (J Bus Res 109(1):101–110, 2020) proposed ‘confirmatory composite analysis’ as a method of confirming measurement quality (MCMQ) in partial least squares structural equation modeling. As a response to their study and to prevent researchers from confusing the two, this article explains what CCA and MCMQ are, what steps they entail and what differences they have. Moreover, to demonstrate their efficacy, a scenario analysis was conducted. The results of this analysis imply that to assess composite models, researchers should use CCA, and to assess reflective and causal–formative measurement models, researchers should apply structural equation modeling including confirmatory factor analysis instead of Hair et al.’s MCMQ. Finally, the article offers a set of corrections to the article of Hair et al. (2020) and stresses the importance of ensuring that the applied model assessment criteria are consistent with the specified model.
Keywords: Confirmatory composite analysis; CCA; Composite model; Method of confirming measurement quality; Structural equation modeling; Latent variables; Emergent variables; Model fit assessment; PLS-SEM; 62H99; 62P25; 91C99 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-020-00405-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00405-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/business/journal/11846
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00405-0
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Managerial Science is currently edited by R. Ewert and W. Kürsten
More articles in Review of Managerial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().