Governing professional microfinance associations: the Tanzanian case through the prism of institutional design

Tristan Caballero-Montes and Cécile Godfroid ()
Additional contact information
Tristan Caballero-Montes: Université de Mons (UMONS)
Cécile Godfroid: Université de Mons (UMONS)

Review of Managerial Science, 2025, vol. 19, issue 2, No 8, 623-648

Abstract: Abstract Given recent criticisms, orienting the practices of microfinance institutions towards the achievement of their social missions is critical. Going beyond the dichotomous “government-or-market” view, we investigate a fundamental but barely studied actor: professional microfinance associations (MFAs). Despite their central position and the roles that they aim to endorse in the field, MFAs face organizational and governance obstacles limiting their impact, including free riding among member organizations. Our study explores the root causes of free riding within microfinance associations. Thanks to a three-month stay at the Tanzanian MFA, TAMFI, we carried out an immersive fieldwork, which enabled us to collect diverse types of qualitative data, in an inductive perspective: observations during multiple events related to TAMFI’s activities and initiatives, multiple semi-directed interviews with key, local, stakeholders, and reviews of specific documents and reports available at the MFA. Discovering the organizational issues faced by the MFA, we used Elinor Ostrom’s institutional design principles for governing collective action as theoretical lenses, which helped explain some of the mechanisms preventing the MFA to play its desired roles. Among root causes of free riding, we identified trade-offs related to membership heterogeneity, inappropriate distribution of inputs and outputs among member organizations, the lack of monitoring and sanctioning capacity of the associations, and a weak integration into regulatory processes, especially. With a theoretical contribution, we also suggest interdependencies among these institutional issues, which should be considered when governing microfinance associations.

Keywords: Governance; Microfinance; Professional associations; Institutional design; Free riding; Commons; G3; G20; D7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-024-00767-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00767-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/business/journal/11846

DOI: 10.1007/s11846-024-00767-9

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Managerial Science is currently edited by R. Ewert and W. Kürsten

More articles in Review of Managerial Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().