Reasons and consequences of changes in Russian research assessment policies

Denis Kosyakov and Andrey Guskov ()
Additional contact information
Denis Kosyakov: Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology
Andrey Guskov: Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology

Scientometrics, 2022, vol. 127, issue 8, No 15, 4609-4630

Abstract: Abstract The transition to quantitative methods of assessing scientific performance in Russian science in the early 2010s led to a sharp increase in publication activity. It has been accompanied by inflation—an outstripping increase in the publications number due to not always justified collaborations that allow results to be credited to several organisations and a decrease in the average quality of the publication flow. Growth has been achieved mainly through publications in conference proceedings and low-rated journals. Since 2020, the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation has applied a new assessment methodology that implements the model of collaboration penalty and quartile bonuses: fractional count of publications and multiplying factors for ones in high-impact journals. The analysis carried out as part of this study shows that the primary beneficiaries of this transformation are academic institutions specializing in Chemistry, Materials Science, and Life Sciences. Organisations traditionally strong in Physics and Astronomy are somewhat inferior to the leaders, mainly due to active participation in mega-collaborations. A separate scale of quality factors gives unjustified advantages to social science organisations, which may exacerbate the number of scientific ethics breaches. In general, the new system should help mitigate distortions in the development of Russian science. However, some side effects of its implementation need increased attention and will probably require adjustments in the methodology.

Keywords: Performance-based science policy; Research assessment; Scientific performance; Fractional count; Collaborations; Metrics; Collaboration penalty; Quartile bonus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04469-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04469-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11192

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04469-5

Access Statistics for this article

Scientometrics is currently edited by Wolfgang Glänzel

More articles in Scientometrics from Springer, Akadémiai Kiadó
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().