A Multivariate Generalized Linear Model Approach to Mediation Analysis and Application of Confidence Ellipses

Brandie D. Wagner (), Miranda Kroehl, Ryan Gan, Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson, Scott D. Sagel, Paula D. Riggs, Talia Brown, Janet Snell-Bergeon and Gary O. Zerbe
Additional contact information
Brandie D. Wagner: University of Colorado Denver
Miranda Kroehl: University of Colorado Denver
Ryan Gan: University of Colorado
Susan K. Mikulich-Gilbertson: University of Colorado Denver
Scott D. Sagel: University of Colorado School of Medicine
Paula D. Riggs: University of Colorado School of Medicine
Talia Brown: University of Colorado
Janet Snell-Bergeon: University of Colorado School of Medicine
Gary O. Zerbe: University of Colorado Denver

Statistics in Biosciences, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, No 9, 139-159

Abstract: Abstract Mediation analysis evaluates the significance of an intermediate variable on the causal pathway between an exposure and an outcome. One commonly utilized test for mediation involves evaluation of counterfactual effects, estimated from separate regression models, corresponding to a composite null hypothesis. However, the “compositeness” of this null hypothesis is not commonly acknowledged and accounted for in mediation analyses. We describe a generalized multivariate approach in which these separate regression models are fit simultaneously in a single parsimonious model. This multivariate modeling approach can reproduce standard mediation analysis and has notable advantages over separate regression models, including the ability to combine distributions in the exponential family with any link functions and perform likelihood-based tests of some relevant hypotheses using existing software. We propose the use of a novel visual representation of confidence intervals of the two estimates for the indirect path with the use of a confidence ellipse. The calculation of the confidence ellipse is facilitated by the multivariate approach, can test the components of the composite null hypothesis under a single experiment-wise type I error rate, and does not require estimation of the standard error of the product of coefficients from two separate regressions. This method is illustrated using three examples. The first compares results between the multivariate method and separate regression models. The second example illustrates the proposed methods in the presence of an exposure–mediator interaction, missing data and confounding, and the third example utilizes these proposed methods for an outcome and mediator with negative binomial distributions.

Keywords: Composite null hypothesis; Counterfactual effects; Exponential family of distributions; Exposure–mediator interaction; Likelihood ratio test for mediation; Scheffe’ simultaneous confidence limits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-017-9191-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stabio:v:10:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12561-017-9191-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/12561

DOI: 10.1007/s12561-017-9191-2

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics in Biosciences is currently edited by Hongyu Zhao and Xihong Lin

More articles in Statistics in Biosciences from Springer, International Chinese Statistical Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().