Do internationally operating companies act in a socially sustainable manner? An empirical comparison of disclosure regarding employee matters and human rights matters

Stefanie Reustlen () and Martin Stawinoga ()
Additional contact information
Stefanie Reustlen: University of Hamburg
Martin Stawinoga: OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts

Sustainability Nexus Forum, 2024, vol. 32, issue 1, No 22, 22 pages

Abstract: Abstract Although employee matters and human rights matters directly affect the corporate environment, research in this area remains nascent. To obtain evidence on the extent of corporate compliance with due diligence obligations, sustainability reporting has been analyzed. Grounded in institutional theory, this study examines the effects of regulation, the degree of professionalization, and sector-specific variations. The research employs a qualitative-interpretative content analysis, focusing on the reporting behaviour of 12 listed companies in Germany from both high-risk and low-risk sectors. The reporting periods selected are 2017 and 2021, chosen to examine the impact of regulations under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD) and the Second Shareholder Rights Directive. The results show that regulation influences the disclosure of employee matters and human rights matters. Furthermore, there is a difference in the level of specificity regarding these matters, as well as in terms of opportunities and risks. The intensity of regulation also has an impact on the comparability and quality of reporting. By analyzing the reporting behaviour concerning two central social matters, this study compares the disclosure of employee matters and human rights matters, thereby contributing to the broader understanding of corporate social responsibility as well as gaining knowledge regarding sustainable corporate governance processes fostering the transformation towards sustainability-related actions across different sectors. In addition, the study examines both existing (NFRD) and forthcoming Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) EU reporting obligations within a unified research framework, thus contributing to the advancement of sustainability reporting from an institutional theoretical perspective.

Keywords: Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD); Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD); European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS); Institutional theory; Employee matters; Human rights matter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-024-00556-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:32:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s00550-024-00556-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer ... onmental/journal/550

DOI: 10.1007/s00550-024-00556-8

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability Nexus Forum is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Edeltraud Günther, Prof. Dr. Mario Schmidt and Prof. Dr. Uwe Schneidewind

More articles in Sustainability Nexus Forum from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().