EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multi-relay selection in energy-harvesting cooperative wireless networks: game-theoretic modeling and analysis

Mohammed W. Baidas (), Emad Alsusa (), Motasem Alfarra () and Mubarak Al-Mubarak ()
Additional contact information
Mohammed W. Baidas: Kuwait University
Emad Alsusa: University of Manchester
Motasem Alfarra: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Mubarak Al-Mubarak: Ohio State University

Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, 2020, vol. 73, issue 2, No 10, 289-311

Abstract: Abstract This paper studies distributed multi-relay selection in energy-harvesting cooperative wireless networks and models it as an Indian Buffet Game (IBG). Particularly, the IBG is utilized to model the multi-relay selection decisions of network source nodes, while accounting for negative network externality. Two scenarios are considered: (1) constrained selections (CS), and (2) unconstrained selections (US). In the former scenario, each source is constrained to a maximum number of relay selections; while in the latter scenario, the source nodes can select as many relays as possible. Since the relays are energy-harvesting—and thus intermittently harvest random amounts of energy—the accumulated energy at each relay is unknown to the source nodes, leading to uncertain relays’ energy states. In turn, a non-Bayesian learning (NBL) algorithm is devised for the source nodes to learn the relays’ energy states. After that, two distributed best-response (BR) recursive algorithms, namely BR-CS and BR-US, are proposed to allow the source nodes to make multi-relay selection decisions, while guaranteeing subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Simulation results are presented to verify the efficacy of the proposed distributed NBL and multi-relay selection algorithms. Specifically, the NBL is shown to efficiently learn the true relays’ energy states. More importantly, the BR-CS algorithm is shown to be comparable to the centralized multi-relay selection—and superior to other relay selection schemes—in terms of network sum-rate improvement (and utility). Lastly, the number of relay selections of the BR-CS algorithm must be constrained to the minimum so as to reduce complexity and fully exploit diversity gains.

Keywords: Cooperation; Distributed; Energy-harvesting; Game theory; Learning; Multi-relay selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-019-00611-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:telsys:v:73:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-019-00611-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11235

DOI: 10.1007/s11235-019-00611-6

Access Statistics for this article

Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management is currently edited by Muhammad Khan

More articles in Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:73:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-019-00611-6