EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Ensemble Boosting and Bagging Based Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Prediction

Amirhosein Mosavi (), Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini, Bahram Choubin, Massoud Goodarzi, Adrienn A. Dineva () and Elham Rafiei Sardooi
Additional contact information
Amirhosein Mosavi: Ton Duc Thang University
Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini: University of Tehran
Bahram Choubin: West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO
Massoud Goodarzi: Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI), AREEO
Adrienn A. Dineva: Duy Tan University
Elham Rafiei Sardooi: University of Jiroft

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2021, vol. 35, issue 1, No 2, 23-37

Abstract: Abstract Due to the rapidly increasing demand for groundwater, as one of the principal freshwater resources, there is an urge to advance novel prediction systems to more accurately estimate the groundwater potential for an informed groundwater resource management. Ensemble machine learning methods are generally reported to produce more accurate results. However, proposing the novel ensemble models along with running comparative studies for performance evaluation of these models would be equally essential to precisely identify the suitable methods. Thus, the current study is designed to provide knowledge on the performance of the four ensemble models i.e., Boosted generalized additive model (GamBoost), adaptive Boosting classification trees (AdaBoost), Bagged classification and regression trees (Bagged CART), and random forest (RF). To build the models, 339 groundwater resources’ locations and the spatial groundwater potential conditioning factors were used. Thereafter, the recursive feature elimination (RFE) method was applied to identify the key features. The RFE specified that the best number of features for groundwater potential modeling was 12 variables among 15 (with a mean Accuracy of about 0.84). The modeling results indicated that the Bagging models (i.e., RF and Bagged CART) had a higher performance than the Boosting models (i.e., AdaBoost and GamBoost). Overall, the RF model outperformed the other models (with accuracy = 0.86, Kappa = 0.67, Precision = 0.85, and Recall = 0.91). Also, the topographic position index’s predictive variables, valley depth, drainage density, elevation, and distance from stream had the highest contribution in the modeling process. Groundwater potential maps predicted in this study can help water resources managers and policymakers in the fields of watershed and aquifer management to preserve an optimal exploit from this important freshwater.

Keywords: Groundwater potential prediction; Ensemble machine learning models; Decision tree; Boosting; Bagging; Recursive feature elimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02704-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02704-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02704-3

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02704-3