Uncertainty Quantification of Water Level Predictions from Radar‐based Areal Rainfall Using an Adaptive MCMC Algorithm

Duc Hai Nguyen, Seon-Ho Kim, Hyun-Han Kwon and Deg-Hyo Bae ()
Additional contact information
Duc Hai Nguyen: Sejong University
Seon-Ho Kim: Sejong University
Hyun-Han Kwon: Sejong University
Deg-Hyo Bae: Sejong University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2021, vol. 35, issue 7, No 8, 2197-2213

Abstract: Abstract This study proposes an approach for the uncertainty quantification at each stage of a single hydrological process of water level predictions based on different sources of mean areal precipitation (MAP) forecasts by using an adaptive Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. The MAP forecasts are derived from the McGill Algorithm for Precipitation Nowcasting by Lagrangian Extrapolation (MAPLE) system and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. The predicted water levels at two stations in the Gangnam catchment, Seoul, South Korea, are processed with a coupled 1D/2D urban hydrological model (1D/2D-UHM) forced by MAPLE MAP forecasts and LSTM-corrected MAP forecasts of five heavy rainfall events. The proposed Bayesian approach using the delayed rejection and adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm was compared with the Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm in the uncertainty estimation of Weibull distribution parameters. The uncertainty contributions of the stages and sources in the related process were analyzed, including quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) inputs, MAP inputs and 1D/2D-UHM. The results indicate that the uncertainty contribution of the MAPLE MAP forecasting is the highest in the 3-hour forecasting time. The uncertainty contribution of the QPE input for MAPLE MAP forecasting is the smallest and that of two sources, including the LSTM-corrected MAP source, and MAP and the coupled model is more significant than that of the QPE input. This research showed that the adaptive Bayesian MCMC method using the DRAM algorithm might be a robust option in quantitative uncertainty analyses of a single hydrological process, especially for urban flood management.

Keywords: Bayesian approach; Delayed rejection and adaptive Metropolis algorithm; Uncertainty quantification; Urban flood management; Radar‐based forecasts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-02835-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02835-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02835-1

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().