A bottom-up approach to environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis

Johannes Friedrich Carolus, Nick Hanley (), Søren Olsen and Søren Marcus Pedersen
Additional contact information
Johannes Friedrich Carolus: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen
Nick Hanley: University of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine
Søren Marcus Pedersen: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen

Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics from University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development

Abstract: Cost-Benefit Analysis is a method to assess the effects of policies and projects on social welfare. CBAs are usually applied in a top-down approach, in the sense that a decision-making body first decides on which policies or projects are to be considered, and then applies a set of uniform criteria to identifying and valuing relevant cost and benefit flows. This paper investigates the possible advantages, prerequisites and limitations of applying CBA in what may be considered an alternative, “bottom-up”. Instead of starting out with a pre-defined policy option, the suggested approach begins with the underlying environmental problem, and then assesses costs and benefits of various strategies and solutions suggested by local and directly affected stakeholders. For empirical case studies concerning two river catchments in Sweden and Latvia, the bottom-up CBA approach utilises local knowledge, assesses plans which are not only developed for local conditions but are also likely to be more acceptable to local society, and sheds additional light on possible distributional effects. By not only benefitting from, but also supporting participative environmental planning, bottom-up CBA is in line with the growing trend of embedding stakeholder participation into environmental policy and decision-making.

Keywords: Environmental Planning; Stakeholder Approach; Participatory Approaches; Ecosystem Services; Water Framework Directive; Catchment Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B41 D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-cdm, nep-env, nep-ppm and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geograp ... arolus%20et%20al.pdf
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
Journal Article: A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sss:wpaper:2018-03

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics from University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laure Kuhfuss ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).