How wrong can you be? Implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments
Nick Hanley,
Antoni Riera and
Catalina M. Torres Figuerola
No 2010-12, Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics
Abstract:
Despite the vital role of the utility function in welfare measurement, the implications of working with incorrect utility specifications have been largely neglected in the choice experiments literature. This paper addresses the importance of specification with a special emphasis on the effects of mistaken assumptions about the marginal utility of income. Monte Carlo experiments were conducted using different functional forms of utility to generate simulated choices. Multi-Nomial Logit and Mixed Logit models were then estimated on these choices under correct and incorrect assumptions about the true, underlying utility function. Estimated willingness to pay measures from these choice modelling results are then compared with the equivalent measures directly calculated from the true utility specifications. Results show that for the parameter values and functional forms considered, a continuous-quadratic or a discrete-linear attribute specification is a good option regardless of the true effects the attribute has on utility. We also find that mistaken assumptions about preferences over costs magnify attribute mis-specification effects.
Keywords: utility specification; attributes; welfare measurement; accuracy; efficiency; choice experiments; Monte Carlo analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-dcm, nep-ecm and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2710
Related works:
Journal Article: How wrong can you be? Implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:stl:stledp:2010-12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Stirling Economics Discussion Papers from University of Stirling, Division of Economics Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Liam Delaney (liam.delaney@stir.ac.uk this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).