How well do South African schools convert grade 8 achievement into matric outcomes?
Stephen Taylor,
Servaas van der Berg (),
Vijay Reddy () and
Dean Janse van Rensburg ()
Additional contact information
Vijay Reddy: Human Sciences Research Council
Dean Janse van Rensburg: Human Sciences Research Council
No 13/2011, Working Papers from Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
School retention in South Africa and performance in the major school-leaving matric examination are characterised by significant inequalities on the basis of race and socio-economic status. In order to know at what point in the educational trajectory policy interventions and school improvement programmes will be most effective, it is necessary to trace the development of these educational inequalities to earlier phases of schooling and before. This paper reports on findings from a unique dataset that tracks individuals who participated in TIMSS in 2002 as grade 8 students to matric in 2006 and 2007. This permits an investigation into the extent to which educational inequalities are already evident by the eighth grade, and what if anything is achieved by secondary schools to reduce them. Several noteworthy findings emerge. The overall level of achievement, at both grade 8 and matric, differs widely across the historically different parts of the school system. There are also intriguing differences in the abilities of different parts of the system to convert grade 8 achievement into matric outcomes. What is clear is that inequalities in the cognitive ability of students at the outset of secondary school persist and that there is no observable evidence of a closing of these gaps by matric. This points to the importance of interventions prior to secondary school – at the primary school level and even at the level of early childhood development. Finally, it is also demonstrated that the decision to take mathematics in matric is characterised by a high degree of randomness within the historically black part of the school system. This points to the value of meaningful assessment practices and feedback to students, which serve as an important signal as to whether or not to choose mathematics as a matric subject.
Keywords: South Africa; Socio-economic Status; Education; Educational Achievement; Educational Inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 I21 I30 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr, nep-edu, nep-lab and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2011/wp132011/wp-13-2011.pdf First version, 2011 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers141
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Melt van Schoor ().