(Neo-)extractivism – a new challenge for development theory from Latin America
Hans-Jürgen Burchardt and
Kristina Dietz
Third World Quarterly, 2014, vol. 35, issue 3, 468-486
Abstract:
This paper addresses new challenges and identifies starting points for development theory following recent debates in Latin America on ‘new or neo-extractivism’. It focuses on the concept of neo-extractivism and the context of its emergence, and on the changing role of the state. Looking at a number of social economic indicators, we find that, even after considering differences between countries, (neo-)extractivism is not merely a temporary economic strategy in the region. Instead, it exhibits features of a consolidated development project. Empirical evidence from the region shows the fundamental implications of resource-based development paths in politics, social relations and territorial orders. To grasp these implications conceptually, we argue for a shift in theoretical perspectives related to the link between development and resource extraction. Key elements for such a shift are to be found in recent studies in rentier theory and politics and new approaches in the field of political ecology.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:35:y:2014:i:3:p:468-486
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ctwq20
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
Access Statistics for this article
Third World Quarterly is currently edited by Shahid Qadir
More articles in Third World Quarterly from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().