Estimation of accuracy of patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling: case study on a post polio residual paralysis subject

T. Dao, F. Marin, P. Pouletaut, F. Charleux, P. Aufaure and M. Ho Ba Tho

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2012, vol. 15, issue 7, 745-751

Abstract: For patients with patterns ranging out of anthropometric standard values, patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling becomes crucial for clinical diagnosis and follow-up. However, patient-specific modelling using imaging techniques and motion capture systems is mainly subject to experimental errors. The aim of this study was to quantify these experimental errors when performing a patient-specific musculoskeletal model. CT scan data were used to personalise the geometrical model and its inertial properties for a post polio residual paralysis subject. After having performed a gait-based experimental protocol, kinematics data were measured using a VICON motion capture system with six infrared cameras. The musculoskeletal model was computed using a direct/inverse algorithm (LifeMod software). A first source of errors was identified in the segmentation procedure in relation to the calculation of personalised inertial parameters. The second source of errors was subject related, as it depended on the reproducibility of performing the same type of gait. The impact of kinematics, kinetics and muscle forces resulting from the musculoskeletal modelling was quantified using relative errors and the absolute root mean square error. Concerning the segmentation procedure, we found that the kinematics results were not sensitive to the errors (relative error < 1%). However, a strong influence was noted on the kinetics results (deviation up to 71%). Furthermore, the reproducibility error showed a significant influence (relative mean error varying from 5 to 30%). The present paper demonstrates that in patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling variations due to experimental errors derived from imaging techniques and motion capture need to be both identified and quantified. Therefore, the paper can be used as a guideline.

Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2011.558086 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:15:y:2012:i:7:p:745-751

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.558086

Access Statistics for this article

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton

More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().