Assessing the impact of North Carolina's predatory lending law

Roberto Quercia, Michael Stegman and Walter Davis

Housing Policy Debate, 2004, vol. 15, issue 3, 573-601

Abstract: This article examines changes in subprime mortgage originations before and after the implementation of North Carolina's Predatory Lending Law. Previous studies have noted a decline in overall subprime lending. This was to be expected, since the law was intended to reduce the number of predatory or abusive subprime loans. But which components of subprime lending declined, which remained stable or increased, and what happened to those loans that the law defines as predatory? Using a database of 3.3 million loans from 1998 to 2002, we find that the reduction that occurred after the law took effect was entirely due to a decline in refinancing loans and that almost 90 percent of this decline can be traced to a reduction in predatory loans. The law is doing what it was intended to do: eliminate abusive loans without restricting the supply of subprime mortgage capital for borrowers with blemished credit records.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2004.9521514 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:573-601

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20

DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2004.9521514

Access Statistics for this article

Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra

More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().