An introduction to the use of randomised control trials to evaluate development interventions
Howard White
Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2013, vol. 5, issue 1, 30-49
Abstract:
Randomised control trials (RCTs) analyse what difference a programme makes through comparing those in the programme to a control group who do not receive it. Random assignment to the project and control groups overcomes selection bias which will otherwise occur from programme placement or self-selection. Conducting an RCT requires decisions regarding the unit of assignment, the number of 'treatment arms' and what, if anything, will be provided to the control group and when. A variety of RCT designs are available, including encouragement designs, raised threshold designs, randomising across the pipeline, and factorial designs, which are decided upon according to the intervention and the evaluation question. This article also addresses criticisms of RCTs, which are mostly argued to rest on misunderstandings of the approach.
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2013.764652 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: An introduction to the use of randomized control trials to evaluate development interventions (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:30-49
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJDE20
DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2013.764652
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Effectiveness is currently edited by Howard White
More articles in Journal of Development Effectiveness from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().