Closing the evaluation cycle

Miguel Szekely

Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2015, vol. 7, issue 4, 453-461

Abstract: This paper argues that the incentives faced by different actors, and the way in which the evaluation function is organised in governments, can inhibit evaluation use. Three types of institutional arrangements for evaluation are identified in Latin America, and the advantages and challenges of the different models are discussed. Some examples of how countries have started to close the results-based management cycle under different arrangements are presented for Peru and Mexico.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2015.1098718 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:453-461

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJDE20

DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2015.1098718

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Development Effectiveness is currently edited by Howard White

More articles in Journal of Development Effectiveness from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().