A Survey of Principles Instructors: Why Lecture Prevails
William L. Goffe and
David Kauper
The Journal of Economic Education, 2014, vol. 45, issue 4, 360-375
Abstract:
For many years, surveys have shown that lecture is the dominant method for teaching principles of economics (Watts and Schaur 2011; Watts and Becker 2008; Becker and Watts 1996, 2001a, b). The authors confirm this and augment it by asking why principles instructors teach the way they do. The respondents, 340 principles instructors at the 2012 Allied Social Science Associations (ASSA) conference, group into thirds: one-third saying that students learn best from lecture; another third reporting that students do not learn best from lecture, but it is cost-effective; and the rest answering that students do not learn best from lecture, so alternatives are preferred. Lecture advocates often cite the inputs and costs of teaching while advocates of alternatives often cite student outcomes.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2014.946547 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:45:y:2014:i:4:p:360-375
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/VECE20
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2014.946547
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Economic Education is currently edited by William Walstad
More articles in The Journal of Economic Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst (chris.longhurst@tandf.co.uk).