Tensions and Risks of Social Enterprises’ Scaling Strategies: The Case of Microfinance Institutions in China

Meng Zhao and Jun Han

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2020, vol. 11, issue 2, 134-154

Abstract: The scale-up of social enterprises is usually assumed to bring positive social change. Yet, the negative side, particularly the tensions and risks, in the scaling process is largely ignored. This research aims to explore the tensions and risks related to different scaling strategies. Based on a comparative case study on two leading Chinese microfinance institutions – Grameen China and CFPA Microfinance – that both adopt the Grameen Bank model, this research draws on the lens of institutional logics to understand the microfoundations of five types of tensions and three kinds of risks in the scaling process of the two microfinance institutions. This research provides an integrative framework that captures the nuanced sources, forms and challenges in the scaling of social enterprises.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19420676.2019.1604404 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:134-154

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJSE20

DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1604404

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship is currently edited by Alex Nicholls

More articles in Journal of Social Entrepreneurship from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().