Politics and banking in Russia: the rise of Putin
Koen Schoors and
Laurent Weill
Post-Soviet Affairs, 2020, vol. 36, issue 5-6, 451-474
Abstract:
We investigate whether lending by the dominant Russian state bank, Sberbank, contributed to Vladimir Putin’s ascent to power during the presidential elections of March2000. Our hypothesis is that Sberbank corporate loans were used as incentives for managers at private firms to mobilize employees to vote for Putin. In line with our proposed voter mobilization mechanism, we find that the growth of regional corporate Sberbank loans in the months before the presidential election is related to the regional increase in votes for Putin and to the regional increase in voter turnout between the Duma election of December1999 and the presidential election of March2000. The effect is pronounced in regions where the governor is affiliated with the regime and in regions with extensive private employment, and less apparent in regions bequeathed with single-company towns, where voter intimidation suffices to get the required result. The results are highly robust.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1785245 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: POLITICS AND BANKING IN RUSSIA: THE RISE OF PUTIN (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:36:y:2020:i:5-6:p:451-474
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rpsa20
DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2020.1785245
Access Statistics for this article
Post-Soviet Affairs is currently edited by Timothy Frye
More articles in Post-Soviet Affairs from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().